The governing body of the City of Richmond may, for any special use permit issued after July 1, 2000, impose on holders of a liquor retail licence a condition that the special use permit be subject to automatic review by the management authority in the event of a change in ownership, or change in ownership of the business. or a transfer of majority control of the business entity. After review by the Board of Directors, it may amend or revoke the Special Use Authorization after publication and public consultation in accordance with § 15.2-2206. No offer will be accepted by a locality unless it has accepted a capital improvement program in accordance with § 15.2-2239 or a local charter. In the event that the conditions offered involve the consecration of real property or the payment of cash, ownership cannot be transferred and cash payment cannot be made until the facilities for which the property is intended or cash is not offered have been included in the capital improvement program, provided that nothing herein prevents a locality from: accept the terms and conditions offered that are not normally included in a capital improvement program. If the conditions offered include the dedication of land or payment in cash, the conditions offered provide for the disposition of the property or payment in cash in the event that the property or cash payment is not used for the proposed purpose. Chris then talked about building on last session`s bill that would require local business development incentives to plan and provide affordable housing, which will be expanded to all economic development incentive programs. The May 17 article by Andrew Wimer of the Institute for Justice, a public interest law firm titled Rules That Require People to Buy Large Homes, is costing market Americans dearly, using three communities across the country that have minimum housing size requirements as examples of local land use regulations exacerbating the housing affordability crisis. and possibly unconstitutional. The three communities mentioned in the article are Highland Lake, Alabama; Calhoun, Georgia; and the report and main article of the article: Big Water, Utah! Some excerpts: B. Zoning orders for all purposes consider a residential facility with no more than eight elderly, frail or disabled persons living with one or more resident councillors or other staff members to be a residential occupation by a single family.
Conditions more restrictive than those applicable to dwellings occupied by persons related by blood, marriage or adoption may not be imposed on such establishments. For the purposes of this subsection, “residential facility” means any assisted living facility or residential facility where elderly, frail or disabled persons reside with one or more resident counsellors or other staff members and for which the Ministry of Social Services is the licensing authority under this Code. The governing body or zoning appeal board of the cities of Hampton and Norfolk may impose a condition on any special exemption or licence to use licences for retail liquor control that provides that such special exemption or licence to use automatically applies upon a change of ownership, a change in ownership, a change in the operation or management of a facility, or the expiration of a specified period. F. The provisions of this Section do not apply to new residential developments or new residential uses occurring in any of the following areas: (i) an approved master plan for small areas in which the delineated area is designated as a revitalization area, includes public transportation as defined in § 33.2-100, includes mixed-use development, and permits a density of at least 3.0 land area ratios in a portion of these; (ii) an approved small area master plan that includes an existing or planned Metrorail station or that is adjacent to a nearby Metrorail station that allows for additional density in the vicinity of that existing or planned station; or (iii) an approved service district created in accordance with § 15.2-2400 and including an existing or planned subway station. The left is starting to put more emphasis on the public sector in many of these areas. What I say is proven by the superior model! Show that the public sector can build better hospitals, better schools, better transport, better cities, better housing. Stop trying to protect the old, the rooted, the irrelevant; fully engage the public sector in the future. The second example comes from the city of Washington.
www.stgeorgeutah.com/news/archive/2022/06/10/tsb-parking-availability-at-proposed-200-unit-housing-complex-in-washington-city-sparks-debate-with-developer/#.YqgDtS1OKf1 When establishing the rules, the site may establish one or more noise trapping zones as an amendment to its area map and adopt various measures to be taken in each zone, taking into account the severity of the effects of aircraft noise on buildings and structures in each zone: must be deployed or installed. Such regulations or changes to an area map must provide the affected landowners with an appropriate notification procedure. Orders or amendments to a development plan shall be published in accordance with this chapter. All registered surveys, subdivision areas and final site plans approved after January 1, 2003 must be accompanied by a declaration that a parcel of land is wholly or partially located in an airport noise zone. No existing land use affected by the enactment of such regulations or amendments to an area map will be considered a non-compliant use solely as a result of the regulations or amendments. The provisions of this section do not affect local or flight noise mitigation regulations issued before the effective date of this Act, and such rules and orders may be amended provided that the amendments do not alter the building materials, construction methods, plan submission requirements, or inspection practices set forth in the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code. In addition to local regulations restricting housing, Thompson then pays close attention to the processes local governments put in place to approve new projects or change rules that allow or require public contributions. He says: D. No place shall deal with private personal meetings of the owner of an approved winery who resides in the Hofkellerei or on adjacent land owned or controlled by that owner and where the winery is not sold or marketed and for which the Hofkellerei or its agents receive no consideration differently from private personal meetings of other citizens. D. Regulatory flexibility granted in a functional riparian development area may include (i) special zoning for the county, (ii) use of a special permit procedure, (iii) exemption from certain specified orders, other than ordinances or provisions of orders issued pursuant to the requirements of the Chesapeake Bay Preservation Act (§ 62.1-44.15:67 et seq.), of the Sediment Erosion and Control Act (§ 62.1-44.15:51 et seq.).
were included. and the Virginia Stormwater Management Act (§ 62.1-44.15:24 et seq.) and (iv) any other incentive issued by ordinance that binds the site for a period of up to 10 years. F. In all cases where a site has agreed to the proposed conditions that include pedestrian improvements, and the Virginia Department of Transportation has reviewed and has not objected to the proposed pedestrian improvements during the rezoning process, the Virginia Department of Transportation will authorize the construction of the proposed improvements. unless such improvements violate local improvements, laws, regulations or technical and safety standards prescribed by the state or federal government. Any place in whose jurisdiction a licensed airport or U.S. government or air force is located may apply building regulations relating to the provision or installation of sound processing measures in residential buildings and structures or parts thereof that are not agricultural structures for which building permits are issued after January 1. 2003, in areas affected by above-average aircraft noise levels due to their proximity to flight operations at nearby airports.
